An expensive way to flip a coin

By:

Randle, T

Series: Building ; 270(8367) 4 February 2005, 50-51(2)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):

Summary: Argues that for certain construction disputes it is better for adjudication to be bypassed. This is because the process is often time consuming and costly for a result that is only interim and non-binding. This particularly applies to the larger more complex disputes that arguably cannot be resolved by the processes of an adjudication.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS68722 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	128855-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS68718 Where is the land?	ABS68720 R (on the application of Persimmon Homes (South East) Ltd) and another v Secretary of State for Transport	ABS68721 Delivering sustainable communities	ABS68722 An expensive way to flip a coin	ABS68723 The price we pay	ABS68724 A legal trap for contractors?	ABS68725 Stop having fun	Next

Argues that for certain construction disputes it is better for adjudication to be bypassed. This is because the process is often time consuming and costly for a result that is only interim and non-binding. This particularly applies to the larger more complex disputes that arguably cannot be resolved by the processes of an adjudication.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)