Mind the gap
Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 149(7) 18 February 2005, 202-203 (2)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):- SMITH V EXPRESS DAIRY
- SCRIBES WEST V RELSA ANSTALT AND OTHERS
- BROWN AND ROOT TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER V SUN ALLIANCE AND LONDON ASSURANCE CO LTD
- EAST LINDSEY DC V THOMPSON
- SCHALIT V NADLER
- SECTION 25 NOTICES
- LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 S27(1)
- LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S38A
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S141(2)
- FORFEITURE
- ENFORCEMENT NOTICES
- BREAK NOTICES
- LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS68838 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 129038-1001 |
Examines the potential dangers of the period between the purchase and registration of a commercial property; a gap during which the buyer does not always have full ownership rights and cannot necessarily start his intended active management programme for the building. Considers the various problems and issues that could arise during the registration gap:Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 renewals; the granting of new excluded leases; agreements to surrender, break and enforcement notices; forfeiture and notices of assignment. Concludes that e-conveyancing, when it comes fully into operation, will bridge the registration gap by achieving simultaneous completion and transfer of title.