Tenant's counter-notice - validity issues: Lancecrest Ltd v Ganiyu Asiwaju
Language: English Series: Commercial Leases ; 19(4) April 2005, 973-975(3)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the issues raised in the case, "Lancecrest Ltd v Ganiyu Asiwaju" ([2005] EWCA Civ 117): whether time is of the essence in a landlord serving a notice to trigger a rent review and whether a letter sent by the tenant in response to the notice was sufficient counter-notice. It was decided that time was not of the essence in regards to the trigger notice but was of the essence for the counter-notice. The letter sent by the tenant was held to be a valid counter-notice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L129495 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 129495-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the issues raised in the case, "Lancecrest Ltd v Ganiyu Asiwaju" ([2005] EWCA Civ 117): whether time is of the essence in a landlord serving a notice to trigger a rent review and whether a letter sent by the tenant in response to the notice was sufficient counter-notice. It was decided that time was not of the essence in regards to the trigger notice but was of the essence for the counter-notice. The letter sent by the tenant was held to be a valid counter-notice.