Laibility for noise nuisance from wind farms
Language: English Series: Scottish Planning and Environmental Law ; (108) April 2005, 29-31(3)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):- BELLEW V CEMENT LTD
- BLACKBURN AND ANOTHER V ARC LTD
- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S79(1)(G)
- GILLINGHAM BC V MEDWAY (CHATHAM) DOCK CO LTD AND OTHERS
- HARRISON V SOUTHWARK AND VAUXHALL WATER CO
- HEATH V BRIGHTON CORPORATION
- HUNTER V CANARY WHARF
- NICHOLS V POWERGEN RENEWABLES LTD
- ROBB V DUNDEE CITY COUNCIL
- RUSHNER V POLSUE AND ALFIERI
- SEDLEIGH-DENFIELD V O'CALLAGHAN
- SLATER V MCLELLAN
- TETLEY V CHITTY
- TROTTER V FARNIE
- SCOTLAND
- PROPERTY-INFRASTRUCTURE-POWER AND MINERAL SUPPLY INFRASTRUCTURE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L129693 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 129693-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers why and how manufacturers, installers, landlords and occupiers could be considered the author of, and therefore liable for, nuisance caused by noise generated by wind farms. Includes references to case law.