Turf war
Language: English Series: Regeneration and Renewal ; 9 May 2005, 18-19(2)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Looks at the potential for conflict between developers and conservationists in the case of the Thames Gateway and whether the parties involved can pre-empt future clashes over green space. Contrasts the views and intentions expressed in the government green space strategy for the Thames Gateway " Creating sustainable communities: greening the Gateway" and the pro-nature declarations proposed in "London's life force- how to bring natural values to community strategies", a report published by the wildlife trusts London and English Nature in February 2005. Concludes that the nature conservation case will have to be argued strongly to preserve the Thames Gateway as one of the most valuable areas in environmental terms in southeast England.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L129763 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 129763-1001 |
Looks at the potential for conflict between developers and conservationists in the case of the Thames Gateway and whether the parties involved can pre-empt future clashes over green space. Contrasts the views and intentions expressed in the government green space strategy for the Thames Gateway " Creating sustainable communities: greening the Gateway" and the pro-nature declarations proposed in "London's life force- how to bring natural values to community strategies", a report published by the wildlife trusts London and English Nature in February 2005. Concludes that the nature conservation case will have to be argued strongly to preserve the Thames Gateway as one of the most valuable areas in environmental terms in southeast England.