NCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2)

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [2005] 22 EG 134-141(8)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):

Summary: [2005] EWCA Civ 312, 21 March 2005. Considered whether the appellant landlord (R) had made its decison to refuse consent to a subletting in reasonable time. "Held": the appeal was allowed. The decision had been made within a reasonable time from the date of the letter sent by the claimant tenant (N) formally requesting a sublet.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	L130045 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	130045-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	L130042 Be fair if you must repair	L130043 Reason will prevail	L130044 Stamp duty land tax - update	L130045 NCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2)	L130046 Case news: Seine International and others v Park Lane Holdings	L130047 Financing and valuation problems of the east German real estate market	L130048 Case news: CDC2020 v G Ferreira and another	Next

[2005] EWCA Civ 312, 21 March 2005. Considered whether the appellant landlord (R) had made its decison to refuse consent to a subletting in reasonable time. "Held": the appeal was allowed. The decision had been made within a reasonable time from the date of the letter sent by the claimant tenant (N) formally requesting a sublet.

Back to results

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)