Rent recovery
Language: English Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 149(29) 22 July 2005, 878-879(2)Publication details: 2005Subject(s):- ELLER V GROVECREST INVESTMENTS LTD 1994
- TSB BANK PLC V BOTHAM
- HARVEY V BRIDGES
- MURGATROYD V SILKSTONE AND DODWORTH COAL AND IRON CO LTD
- RE PALMIERO
- SOMERS MEWS INVESTMENTS V MILLER
- SILVERMAN V AFCO (UK)
- PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-FORFEITURE OF BUSINESS TENANCIES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L130556 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 130556-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Suggests that landlords of commercial property can avoid the delays associated with litigation to recover rent by using their right to levy distress or forfeit the lease by peaceable re-entry. Considers the procedure for, and exceptions to, levying distress and how to forfeit a lease. Case law.