Not very highly rated
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 22 October 2005,229(1)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Summary: Analyses the implications of the recent Lands Tribunal landmark decision "Arbib v Earl Cadogan" ( LRA/23/2004, L131346) on the deferment rate to be used for valuing a landlord's reversion for enfranchisement purposes: an appropriate rate of 4.5% rather than the established rate of 6%. Considers the decision to have been based on disappointing evidence. Concludes that "Arbib", if followed and applied, will represent a victory for the landlords of large estates but does not think this will happen of necessity. Lists the outstanding issues still to be explored.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L131432 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 131432-1001 |
Analyses the implications of the recent Lands Tribunal landmark decision "Arbib v Earl Cadogan" ( LRA/23/2004, L131346) on the deferment rate to be used for valuing a landlord's reversion for enfranchisement purposes: an appropriate rate of 4.5% rather than the established rate of 6%. Considers the decision to have been based on disappointing evidence. Concludes that "Arbib", if followed and applied, will represent a victory for the landlords of large estates but does not think this will happen of necessity. Lists the outstanding issues still to be explored.