Gary White and Ellen White v Riverside Housing Association Ltd
Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2005] EWCA Civ 1385, 6 December 2005. Examined whether rent increases are invalid if they do not occur on the dates specified in a lease. R granted W a tenancy which specified that the rent payable would increase on the first Monday of June each year. R did not increase the rent in June 2000 but subsequently wrote to W informing them that their rent was to increase from 2 April 2001. R began possession proceedings against W on the grounds that they had failed to pay their rent but W argued that R had failed to implement the rent increase provisions of the tenancy agreement correctly. "Held": the increases were invalid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132178-1001 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 1385, 6 December 2005. Examined whether rent increases are invalid if they do not occur on the dates specified in a lease. R granted W a tenancy which specified that the rent payable would increase on the first Monday of June each year. R did not increase the rent in June 2000 but subsequently wrote to W informing them that their rent was to increase from 2 April 2001. R began possession proceedings against W on the grounds that they had failed to pay their rent but W argued that R had failed to implement the rent increase provisions of the tenancy agreement correctly. "Held": the increases were invalid.