On a break
Language: English Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 150(6) 17 February 2006, 180-181(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- FITZROY HOUSE EPWORTH STREET (NO 1) LTD AND FITZROY HOUSE EPWORTH STREET (NO 2) LTD V THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD
- REED PERSONNEL SERVICES V AMERICAN EXPRESS EUROPE
- UNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
- JOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD V AMBER PASS LTD
- COMMERCIAL UNION LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD V LABEL INK LTD
- PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-BREACHING COMMERCIAL LEASES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L132618 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132618-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines break clauses in leases, in the light of the decision in "Fitzroy House Epworth Street (No 1) Ltd v The Financial Times Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 2391 TCC, L132147). Warns that landlords must co-operate with tenants in any proposals to break the lease, and must not ignore the tenant or be deliberately obstructive. Tenants must take reasonable steps to ensure compliance with any preconditions in the break clause.