Expert witnesses making an impression
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 156(7213) 24 February 2006, 308-309(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PART 35
- LIVERPOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESAN TRUST V GOLDBERG (NO 3)
- SPE INTERNATIONAL V PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION CONTRACTORS (UK) LTD
- CAIRNSTORES V AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE
- PEARCE V OVE ARUP PARTNERSHIP LTD AND OTHERS
- HUSSEIN V WILLIAM HILL GROUP
- PHILLIPS AND ANOTHER V SYMES AND ANOTHER
- GOUGH V MUMMERY
- KRANIDIOTES V PASCHALI
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES-EXPERT EVIDENCE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L132768 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132768-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Looks at the qualities expected of an expert witness in civil cases. An expert must be able to assist the court in matters within his expertise, and be independent; be capable of writing a helpful report; be committed to the case; and show a knowledge of court procedure and the Civil Procedure Rules. Outlines the qualities required in an expert's report. Also lists some attributes that will not impress a court.