Or not enough
Language: English Series: Building ; 271(8424) 31 March 2006, 62-63(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- KIER REGIONAL LTD (T/A WALLIS) V CITY AND GENERAL (HOLBORN) LTD
- CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
- BUXTON BUILDING CONTRACTORS V DURAND PRIMARY SCHOOL GOVERNORS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133032 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133032-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reports the facts of, and comments upon, "Kier Regional Ltd v City and General (Holborn) Ltd" ([2006] All ER (D) 64 TCC, L133402), where it was decided that an adjudicator's decision was not invalidated by a refusal to consider expert's reports that were produced after the adjudication had begun. The court has thus shown that it is willing to uphold the adjudication process, and will ignore technical legal arguments advanced against an adjudicator's decision. Whilst the rules of natural justice still apply in adjudication, only very clear cases of breach will invalidate a decision.