Serious irregularity procedural and substantive aspects of section 68
Language: English Series: Arbitration Law Monthly ; March 2006, 3-5(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: The decision in "Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd" ([2005] TCC, unreported) illustrates the unwillingness of the courts to allow spurious procedural objections raised under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68 to challenge the outcome of an arbitration. The case set out a procedural checklist for applications under s68, on all of which the claimants failed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133111 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133111-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The decision in "Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd" ([2005] TCC, unreported) illustrates the unwillingness of the courts to allow spurious procedural objections raised under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68 to challenge the outcome of an arbitration. The case set out a procedural checklist for applications under s68, on all of which the claimants failed.