Image from Google Jackets

Duty-bound to tell the truth

By: Language: English Series: Property Week ; 71(15) 14 April 2006, 76-77(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: RICS members fear that they will be placed at a commercial disadvantage if the latest RICS practice statement for expert witnesses is published in its present form. They claim that the rules that RICS expert witnesses must follow are harsher than those applied by the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) to chartered planners. For instance, the consultation document states that RICS members should put their duty to the court over their duty to the client. This involves stating in their professional opinion whether they agree with their client or not. In contrast, town planners do not have to volunteer this information. RICS must therefore decide whether it should relax its rules, or ask the RTPI to change its rules. However, there are surfacing indications that the RTPI will be resistant.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L133143 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 133143-1001

RICS members fear that they will be placed at a commercial disadvantage if the latest RICS practice statement for expert witnesses is published in its present form. They claim that the rules that RICS expert witnesses must follow are harsher than those applied by the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) to chartered planners. For instance, the consultation document states that RICS members should put their duty to the court over their duty to the client. This involves stating in their professional opinion whether they agree with their client or not. In contrast, town planners do not have to volunteer this information. RICS must therefore decide whether it should relax its rules, or ask the RTPI to change its rules. However, there are surfacing indications that the RTPI will be resistant.