What documents are really needed in order to resolve a construction dispute?
Language: English Series: Construction Law Journal ; (2006) 22 160-171(12)Publication details: 2006Subject(s):- GLAXO GROUP LTD V DOWELHURST LTD
- FIDIC CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR EPC/TURNKEY PROJECTS 1999 EDITION
- PPC2000
- NEC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (THIRD EDITION)
- JCT 1998 PRIVATE WITH QUANTITIES
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133532 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133532-2001 |
Insufficient attention is often paid to the difference between the quantity and quality of documentation, and the question of which of it is material, in a construction dispute. The level of documentation that is relevant, necessary or proportionate will vary depending on the circumstances of each particular dispute. The temptation to produce every available document must be resisted; swamping the court with documents is likely only to increase costs and obscure the main points at issue. Contains summary of documentary requirements from common standard forms of contract.