Leases and contractual licences
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; no 8801, 9/1/88 p65Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: Discusses Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold and Co and Another , CA 27 October 1987, see Abstract 38589, in which the judge concluded, that a contractual licence could not bind a purchaser simply because he had notice of the licensee`s occupation.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2403-15 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 12048-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold and Co and Another , CA 27 October 1987, see Abstract 38589, in which the judge concluded, that a contractual licence could not bind a purchaser simply because he had notice of the licensee`s occupation.