Moses v Leahy (Valuation Officer)
Language: English Series: Rating and Valuation Reporter ; 2006, 117-119(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: [2006] EWCA Civ 116, 1 February 2006. Concerns the rateable value of premises that M believed to be unfit for occupation. M sought permission to appeal from a Lands Tribunal decision ([2005] RA 315) that dismissed an appeal against the 2000 rating list entry for the property. M said he had not received a fair hearing from a Lands Tribunal member who had refused to sign a statement to the effect that, as hypothetical tenant, the member would take a lease to occupy the property. "Held": permission refused. No challenge on the grounds of error of law had been identified. The Lands Tribunal member was correct to refuse to sign the statement and was entitled to refuse to adjourn to inspect the premises.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | L133949 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133949-1001 |
[2006] EWCA Civ 116, 1 February 2006. Concerns the rateable value of premises that M believed to be unfit for occupation. M sought permission to appeal from a Lands Tribunal decision ([2005] RA 315) that dismissed an appeal against the 2000 rating list entry for the property. M said he had not received a fair hearing from a Lands Tribunal member who had refused to sign a statement to the effect that, as hypothetical tenant, the member would take a lease to occupy the property. "Held": permission refused. No challenge on the grounds of error of law had been identified. The Lands Tribunal member was correct to refuse to sign the statement and was entitled to refuse to adjourn to inspect the premises.