Image from Google Jackets

Riverside Housing Association Limited v The Commissioners for her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWHC 2383 (Ch), 3 October 2006. Considers whether the cost of the construction of R's new office building is zero rated for VAT, on the basis of R's charitable status. R, a charity and a registered social landlord under the Housing Act 1996, requested a certificate of zero rating for the work, however this was refused. R appealed to the VAT and Duties Tribunal under the Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sched 8 Group 5 Item 2, however the appeal was dismissed on the basis that, even though R was a charity, the building was to be used for business purposes. R then appealed to the Court. "Held": appeal dismissed. The activities of R are carried out in the course or furtherance of a business and the construction of their new office is therefore not zero rated for VAT.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 135243-1001

[2006] EWHC 2383 (Ch), 3 October 2006. Considers whether the cost of the construction of R's new office building is zero rated for VAT, on the basis of R's charitable status. R, a charity and a registered social landlord under the Housing Act 1996, requested a certificate of zero rating for the work, however this was refused. R appealed to the VAT and Duties Tribunal under the Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sched 8 Group 5 Item 2, however the appeal was dismissed on the basis that, even though R was a charity, the building was to be used for business purposes. R then appealed to the Court. "Held": appeal dismissed. The activities of R are carried out in the course or furtherance of a business and the construction of their new office is therefore not zero rated for VAT.