National Assembly for Wales v. Elizabeth Condron and Miller Argent (South Wales) Limited
Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWCA Civ 1573, 27th November 2006. The appellant appealed against the decision to quash their grant of planning permission for the carrying out of opencast mining and related removal and reclamation operations at the site of some 400 hectares near Merthyr Tydfil in Wales. "Held": it was decided that a chance remark allegedly made by the chairman of the planning committee did not demonstrate an illegitimate predetermination of the planning application and that relevant circumstances relating to the knowledge of the committee and their extensive discussions needed to be acknowledged to put the remark in context.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 136140-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION Essex County Showground Group v Essex County Council | ONLINE PUBLICATION Liaquat Ali v. Robert Lane and another | ONLINE PUBLICATION Sarfraz Pervez Rehman v. Julie Benfield | ONLINE PUBLICATION National Assembly for Wales v. Elizabeth Condron and Miller Argent (South Wales) Limited | ONLINE PUBLICATION James Hay Pensions Trust v First Secretary of State and ors | ONLINE PUBLICATION Regina v. London Borough of Bromley (Respondents) ex parte Barker (FC) (Appellant) | ONLINE PUBLICATION RJ Knapman v Richards and others |
[2006] EWCA Civ 1573, 27th November 2006. The appellant appealed against the decision to quash their grant of planning permission for the carrying out of opencast mining and related removal and reclamation operations at the site of some 400 hectares near Merthyr Tydfil in Wales. "Held": it was decided that a chance remark allegedly made by the chairman of the planning committee did not demonstrate an illegitimate predetermination of the planning application and that relevant circumstances relating to the knowledge of the committee and their extensive discussions needed to be acknowledged to put the remark in context.