Landlord Protect Ltd v Dolman and Others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [2007] 19 EG 154 (CS) (1)Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Summary: Considers whether it is unreasonable for freeholders to require personal guarantee as condition of consent or whether income from sublessees represents adequate security. L contended that D had unreasonably withheld their consent. "Held": The claim was dismissed. The freeholders were not sufficiently protected by the subleases as L had no assets other than the headlease. D had a right to a straightforward guarantee that rent would be paid when due. They had not acted unreasonably by rejecting a three-year limit on that guarantee as it would be needed outside that period.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | L138110 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 138110-2001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers whether it is unreasonable for freeholders to require personal guarantee as condition of consent or whether income from sublessees represents adequate security. L contended that D had unreasonably withheld their consent. "Held": The claim was dismissed. The freeholders were not sufficiently protected by the subleases as L had no assets other than the headlease. D had a right to a straightforward guarantee that rent would be paid when due. They had not acted unreasonably by rejecting a three-year limit on that guarantee as it would be needed outside that period.