Shedding some light
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0731) 4 August 2007, 76-77(2)Publication details: 2007Subject(s):- REGAN V PAUL PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS
- PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832
- RIGHTS OF LIGHT ACT 1959
- TAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
- MIDTOWN LTD V CITY OF LONDON REAL PROPERTY CO LTD
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION-RIGHTS TO LIGHT
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L139727 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 139727-1001 |
Mainly for Students article warns that right to light issues should be considered carefully before embarking on a development project. Rights to light can be either granted or reserved expressly. The right to light, once acquired, is an easement. Surveyors usually apply the 50:50 rule, which provides that there is actionable interference where less than half of the room is lit. Developers often proceed even if there is a potential right to light claim. They may be ready to pay damages if required, but Regan V Paul Properties shows that an injunction is possible and can prove more costly.