Adjudication late referrals, late decisions and invalid rules [electronic resource]
Language: English Series: RICS Feature ; 4 July 2007Publication details: 2007Subject(s):- HART INVESTMENTS LTD V FIDLER AND ANOTHER
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S107
- HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108
- SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
- EPPING ELECTRICAL CO LTD V BRIGGS AND FORRESTER (PLUMBING SERVICES) LTD
- CUBBITT BUILDING AND INTERIORS LTD V FLEETGLADE LTD
- AVEAT HEATING LTD V JERRAM FALKUS CONSTRUCTION LTD
- SIMONS CONSTRUCTION LTD V AARDVARK DEVELOPMENTS LTD
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L140207 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 140207-3001 |
Explains how four recent cases have clarified what happens when an adjudication timetable overruns. The cases have highlighted inequalities between adjudications under different rules, and some leading adjudication decisions have been invalidated. Considers the referral of the dispute within seven days of the adjudication notice, when the 28 days period for the decision runs from, the adjudicator's decision being reached within the 28 day (or extended) period, and the validity of decisions reached on time but communicated a day or two late.