Dodging bullets
Language: English Series: Building ; 272(8498) 21 September 2007, 62-63(2)Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Summary: Considers the best methods for resolving disputes on major construction projects. Suggests that inconsistent adjudication is a risk where multiple parties are involved and that adjudication is best used for simple payment disputes. Presents the case for appointing a dispute adviser as a form of moderator, and shows how projects that involve many contracting parties would benefit from this dispute resolution method.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L140513 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 140513-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the best methods for resolving disputes on major construction projects. Suggests that inconsistent adjudication is a risk where multiple parties are involved and that adjudication is best used for simple payment disputes. Presents the case for appointing a dispute adviser as a form of moderator, and shows how projects that involve many contracting parties would benefit from this dispute resolution method.