Update agriculture
Language: English Series: Solicitors' Journal ; 151(38) 12 October 2007, 1302-1304(2)Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Summary: Examines the implications of the Shirley Trustees v Crabtree judgment upon contested succession applications for agricultural tenancies. Such cases are increasingly rare due to the declining numbers of children following their parents into farming. Details the tests to be met for a successful succession. Argues that this is open to abuse and that the analysis used in this case, which was affected by the Welby v Casswell precedent, did not take full account of real world situations. Some arbitrary results are likely to be produced by this system from time to time.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L141279 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 141279-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines the implications of the Shirley Trustees v Crabtree judgment upon contested succession applications for agricultural tenancies. Such cases are increasingly rare due to the declining numbers of children following their parents into farming. Details the tests to be met for a successful succession. Argues that this is open to abuse and that the analysis used in this case, which was affected by the Welby v Casswell precedent, did not take full account of real world situations. Some arbitrary results are likely to be produced by this system from time to time.