The new size zero
Language: English Series: Building Engineer ; 83(1) January 2008, 18-19(2)Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Summary: Compares and contrasts the UK and Canada's different approaches to delivering energy efficient housing. While Canada adopted a gradual grass routes approach to increase the level of technical debate among key industry players, the UK's "Code for Sustainable Homes" (CSH) was a more top-down approach. Looks at the CSH's limited requirements on air permeability and highlights the advantages of Canada's Super E standard and house programme.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L141915 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 141915-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Compares and contrasts the UK and Canada's different approaches to delivering energy efficient housing. While Canada adopted a gradual grass routes approach to increase the level of technical debate among key industry players, the UK's "Code for Sustainable Homes" (CSH) was a more top-down approach. Looks at the CSH's limited requirements on air permeability and highlights the advantages of Canada's Super E standard and house programme.