Richard Parsons Ltd v Bristol City Council [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2007] EWLands ACQ 190 2006. 4 September 2007. Compensation for compulsory purchase should take into consideration other savings made by the business owner. A retail tenant claimed compensation from the City Council after his shop was compulsorily purchased to build a new shopping centre. The council argued that the retailer would have been liable for the cost of dilapidations, had it not been for the compulsory purchase which relieved the recipient of certain liabilities and that the amount awarded in compensation should reflect this. Held: the Lands Tribunal agreed with the council in principle that breaches of the repair obligation should be taken into consideration, but compensation will be assessed by valuers at a later date.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 142158-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION Wandsworth LBC v Randall | ONLINE PUBLICATION Derbyshire CC v Fallon [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Richard Parsons Ltd v Bristol City Council | ONLINE PUBLICATION Brown v Rice and Patel [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Castle House Investments Ltd v Bradford MDC [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Hunte v Bottomley and Sons Ltd [electronic resource] |
[2007] EWLands ACQ 190 2006. 4 September 2007. Compensation for compulsory purchase should take into consideration other savings made by the business owner. A retail tenant claimed compensation from the City Council after his shop was compulsorily purchased to build a new shopping centre. The council argued that the retailer would have been liable for the cost of dilapidations, had it not been for the compulsory purchase which relieved the recipient of certain liabilities and that the amount awarded in compensation should reflect this. Held: the Lands Tribunal agreed with the council in principle that breaches of the repair obligation should be taken into consideration, but compensation will be assessed by valuers at a later date.