Where are we now?
Language: English Series: Taxation ; 161(4142) 31 January 2008, 98-100(3)Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Summary: Considers the reasons for the dropping of the government's intended Planning Gain Supplement (PGS). Considers the industry's response to this and examines likely options for a replacement policy. Places the PGS in its historical perspective. Argues that many considered it too complicated, and this led to significant opposition which caused the plan to be shelved. Considers the merits of a tariff-based alternative which has been suggested by some in the industry.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L142420 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 142420-1001 |
Considers the reasons for the dropping of the government's intended Planning Gain Supplement (PGS). Considers the industry's response to this and examines likely options for a replacement policy. Places the PGS in its historical perspective. Argues that many considered it too complicated, and this led to significant opposition which caused the plan to be shelved. Considers the merits of a tariff-based alternative which has been suggested by some in the industry.