Implied repairing obligations
Language: English Series: Law Society`s Gazette ; 85(5) 3 February 1988, 32-34(3)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: Discusses cases on landlords implied repairing obligations under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 ss11-16 . Cases include: Dinefwr Borough Council v Jones CA 24 June 1987 (See Abstract 38298), where the main issue was whether notice of the want of repair had been given to local authority landlords; Murray v Birmingham City Council CA 2 June 1987, (See Abstract 38087), which concerned piecemeal repair of a roof by the landlords; Stent v Monmouth District Council CA 21 January 1987, (See Abstract 37713), which concerned the front door of a house exposed to prevailing winds, and Fraser v Hopewood Properties (1986) 1CL 217, where the tenant of a flat brought a claim against his landlord under the Housing Act 1961 s32 .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS38810 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 12497-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses cases on landlords implied repairing obligations under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 ss11-16 . Cases include: Dinefwr Borough Council v Jones CA 24 June 1987 (See Abstract 38298), where the main issue was whether notice of the want of repair had been given to local authority landlords; Murray v Birmingham City Council CA 2 June 1987, (See Abstract 38087), which concerned piecemeal repair of a roof by the landlords; Stent v Monmouth District Council CA 21 January 1987, (See Abstract 37713), which concerned the front door of a house exposed to prevailing winds, and Fraser v Hopewood Properties (1986) 1CL 217, where the tenant of a flat brought a claim against his landlord under the Housing Act 1961 s32 .