Turner v Stevenage BC
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 14 EG 94-97(4) (6/4/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: ChD 22 November 1995. It was held that the request by the arbitrator for an interim payment, at a rate already agreed by both sides, was not misconduct, did not open himself to bias if only one side paid, and was therefore wholly unobjectionable.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54844 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 12503-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 22 November 1995. It was held that the request by the arbitrator for an interim payment, at a rate already agreed by both sides, was not misconduct, did not open himself to bias if only one side paid, and was therefore wholly unobjectionable.