Reclassifying footpaths
Language: English Series: Times ; 17 September 1992, LT23(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Mayhew v SoS for the Environment",CA 10 July 1992, it was held that in deciding whether to reclassify a footpath as a byway open to all traffic a surveying authority was entitled to consider only whether vehicular rights of way existed along the footpath and could not take into account the desirability or suitability of such a reclassification.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2836-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 12524-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Mayhew v SoS for the Environment",CA 10 July 1992, it was held that in deciding whether to reclassify a footpath as a byway open to all traffic a surveying authority was entitled to consider only whether vehicular rights of way existed along the footpath and could not take into account the desirability or suitability of such a reclassification.