LB Lewisham v Malcolm and another [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2007Subject(s):- LB LEWISHAM V MALCOLM AND ANOTHER
- RICHMOND COURT (SWANSEA) LTD V WILLIAMS
- CLARK V T D G LTD
- MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL V ROMANO
- DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995 S22
- DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 2005
- HOUSING ACT 1985 S93
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-DISCRIMINATION-DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
- PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-ASSURED TENANCIES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATON (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 143153-1001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||||||
| ONLINE PUBLICATOIN Guidance on negotiating options and leases for renewable energy schemes [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATOIN Valuation and sale price 2019 [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATOIN RICS Valuation Global Standards 2017 [electronic resource] India National Supplement | ONLINE PUBLICATON LB Lewisham v Malcolm and another [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATON Kipling's six honest men [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATON Taking cover [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATON English house condition survey 2001 |
[2007] EWCA Civ 763, 25 July 2007. Considers whether the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 could be used to prevent landlords seeking possession of a premises when a tenant had breached the conditions of his tenancy. The appellant tenant (M) appealed against a possession order. M was a secure tenant of the respondent local authority (L) with the right to buy his flat. He had sublet his flat without obtaining L's permission and therefore lost his secure status and with it the right to buy. L then commenced possession proceedings. It came to light that M had been suffering from schizophrenia. M argued that his illness had caused him to act irrationally and that possession on the basis of his diagnosis would be unlawful. "Held": M's mental impairment did have a substantial bearing on the case. L's possession order was related to this impairment. M did not have to establish that his illness was the cause of the subletting, as the causal relationship did exist. The obtaining of a possession order or serving of notice to quit would therefore amount to unlawful discrimination on grounds of disability. The loss of security did not provide an exception. Appeal allowed.