Hypothetically speaking
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0815) 19 April 2008, 168-169(2)Publication details: 2008Subject(s):- UNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
- CENTRAL ESTATES LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCLELLAND MOORES AND CO
- NORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANKS CENTRAL BOARD
- BRITISH GAS CORPORATION V UNIVERSITIES SUPERANNUATION SCHEME LTD
- CANARY WHARF INVESTMENTS V TELEGRAPH GROUP LTD
- ARBITRATION ACT 1996
- United Kingdom --
- PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-RENT REVIEW (BUSINESS TENANCIES)
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L143262 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 143262-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Mainly for Students article provides guidance on rent reviews for commercial leases. These periodic reviews are intended to keep commercial rent at or above the current market value. They can involve formal or informal discussions between the parties. Recommends that they are not performed against a background of tight time constraints. Reviews are valued as a hypothetical lease which ignores contingencies which may produce an unfair value, such as a tenant's history at a given location. Details common assumption within leases and underlines the importance of the process to the market. Case law.