The accused
Language: English Series: Building ; 273(8526) 25 April 2008, 28-31(4) Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the fallout from the Office of Fair Trading's (OFT's) four year inquiry into bid rigging in which 112 construction firms were accused of anti-competitive behaviour, including Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Kier, Rok and Willmott Dixon. Explains the background to the enquiry, the OFT's case, the charge of cover pricing, the response of contractors and clients, whether the accused firms will fight, and worst and best case scenarios for the three of the firms.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L143353 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 143353-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the fallout from the Office of Fair Trading's (OFT's) four year inquiry into bid rigging in which 112 construction firms were accused of anti-competitive behaviour, including Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Kier, Rok and Willmott Dixon. Explains the background to the enquiry, the OFT's case, the charge of cover pricing, the response of contractors and clients, whether the accused firms will fight, and worst and best case scenarios for the three of the firms.