Image from Google Jackets

Edstaff Ltd v Anglo Overseas Group (Properties) Ltd [electronic resource]

Language: English Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2008] EWCA Civ 243. A small claim ended up in the Court of Appeal because the decision of a lower court was wrong. The appellant landlord (A) allowed a company (E) licenses to occupy its premises for 18 months and agreed a discount if E paid all the rent in advance. E asked A to waive its one-month notice period to provide it with some security of occupancy. A agreed. E then left early, with one month's notice, and got a refund of the rent paid in advance from the County Court. E argued that the waiver of notice period did not apply to the tenant, only the landlord. Held: appeal allowed. The decision was reversed because the original decision was plainly wrong and there was no evidence to support it. A was entitled to keep all licence fees. The case shows that justice through the courts can take time and be very costly.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 143775-2001

[2008] EWCA Civ 243. A small claim ended up in the Court of Appeal because the decision of a lower court was wrong. The appellant landlord (A) allowed a company (E) licenses to occupy its premises for 18 months and agreed a discount if E paid all the rent in advance. E asked A to waive its one-month notice period to provide it with some security of occupancy. A agreed. E then left early, with one month's notice, and got a refund of the rent paid in advance from the County Court. E argued that the waiver of notice period did not apply to the tenant, only the landlord. Held: appeal allowed. The decision was reversed because the original decision was plainly wrong and there was no evidence to support it. A was entitled to keep all licence fees. The case shows that justice through the courts can take time and be very costly.