Image from Google Jackets

Meghnagi v Hackney LBC [electronic resource]

Language: English Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2008] EWCA Civ 919, 20 December 2007. The freehold interest in a house in hackney was valued at £147 500 as at November 2000, when the house became vested in the local authority after a compulsory purchase. Claimant (M) asked the tribunal to determine the compensation payable to him after the respondent local authority (H) used compulsory purchase to acquire his house. M had left the property in 1993, although his wife and children remained in it until 1997. The property was then left derelict. H decided to sell the property at auction and then withdrew it, instead asking for informal tenders. M argued that the property was worth £320 000, H £120 000. Held: appeal dismissed. Figure was assessed at £147 500 - reached by taking the highest figure offered to H for the property (£135 000) and adding legal and valuation costs in addition to a 15% increase as the high bidder had overestimated the remedial works required to return the property to a habitable condition. This figure was £163 500, and was subsequently adjusted downwards to reflect the difference between Land Registry indexes between the valuation date of November 2007 and the offer date of July 2001.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 144955-1001

[2008] EWCA Civ 919, 20 December 2007. The freehold interest in a house in hackney was valued at £147 500 as at November 2000, when the house became vested in the local authority after a compulsory purchase. Claimant (M) asked the tribunal to determine the compensation payable to him after the respondent local authority (H) used compulsory purchase to acquire his house. M had left the property in 1993, although his wife and children remained in it until 1997. The property was then left derelict. H decided to sell the property at auction and then withdrew it, instead asking for informal tenders. M argued that the property was worth £320 000, H £120 000. Held: appeal dismissed. Figure was assessed at £147 500 - reached by taking the highest figure offered to H for the property (£135 000) and adding legal and valuation costs in addition to a 15% increase as the high bidder had overestimated the remedial works required to return the property to a habitable condition. This figure was £163 500, and was subsequently adjusted downwards to reflect the difference between Land Registry indexes between the valuation date of November 2007 and the offer date of July 2001.