Not in one's backyard case news
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 73(26) 27 June 2008, 85(1)Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Summary: See L144932Summary: Discuss the case Tillotson, [2008] EWLands LP 56 2006, 06 June 2008. Turned around whether landlords of expensive houses could oppose the development of an exclusive estate. The Tillotsons were granted planning permission to build an additional house on the land of their current home. However, restrictive covenants limited building to just one house per land. The Tillotsons applied to the Lands Tribunal to reject the covenant as invalid or to amend it to allow the building of the extra house. Their application was rejected. The tribunal felt that the development could not be allowed as it would weaken the exclusivity of the area.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L145097 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 145097-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
See L144932
Discuss the case Tillotson, [2008] EWLands LP 56 2006, 06 June 2008. Turned around whether landlords of expensive houses could oppose the development of an exclusive estate. The Tillotsons were granted planning permission to build an additional house on the land of their current home. However, restrictive covenants limited building to just one house per land. The Tillotsons applied to the Lands Tribunal to reject the covenant as invalid or to amend it to allow the building of the extra house. Their application was rejected. The tribunal felt that the development could not be allowed as it would weaken the exclusivity of the area.