Image from Google Jackets

Manton Securities Ltd v Nazam (t/a New Dyal Cash & Carry) [electronic resource]

Language: English Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2008] EWCA Civ 805, 17 July 2008. A tenant can have the right to be granted a lease even if it took up the property without the landlord's agreement and was consistently late in paying the rent. In 1997 a cash-and-carry business man (N) moved into retail premises owned by M, but did not take out a formal lease, although he did pay rent. In 2002, M suggested new terms for a 21-year lease if N carried out repairs. A dispute arose around what works had been completed at the tenant's expense and whether the landlord could repossess. In the initial hearing, the judge ordered that N be granted a tenancy, despite his late payment of rent. Held: appeal denied. The Court of Appeal agreed with the first court judge that the tenant could not be evicted and was entitled to a 21-year lease, in spite of his poor payment record.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 145558-1001

[2008] EWCA Civ 805, 17 July 2008. A tenant can have the right to be granted a lease even if it took up the property without the landlord's agreement and was consistently late in paying the rent. In 1997 a cash-and-carry business man (N) moved into retail premises owned by M, but did not take out a formal lease, although he did pay rent. In 2002, M suggested new terms for a 21-year lease if N carried out repairs. A dispute arose around what works had been completed at the tenant's expense and whether the landlord could repossess. In the initial hearing, the judge ordered that N be granted a tenancy, despite his late payment of rent. Held: appeal denied. The Court of Appeal agreed with the first court judge that the tenant could not be evicted and was entitled to a 21-year lease, in spite of his poor payment record.