Kier Regional Ltd (t/a Wallis) v City and General (Holborn) Ltd and 1: Cambridge Gate Properties Ltd, 2: Temple Guiting Manor Limited (2) [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2008Subject(s):- KIER REGIONAL LTD (T/A WALLIS) V CITY AND GENERAL (HOLBORN) LTD
- BJ CRABTREE (INSULATION) LTD V GPT COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
- BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
- CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
- D WILSON (BIRMINGHAM) LIMITED V METROPOLITAN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
- HARLOW AND MILNER V TEASDALE
- HERSCHEL ENGINEERING LTD V BREEN PROPERTY LTD
- INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD V CLEVELAND BRIDGE (UK) LTD
- JAMES MILLER AND PARTNERS LIMITED V WHITWORTH STREET ESTATES (MANCHESTER) LIMITED
- KELLOGG BROWN AND ROOT INC V CONCORDIA MARITIME AG
- MAGGS V MARSH
- MEARS V SAFECAR SECURITY LIMITED
- ROBERTS PETROLEUM LTD V BERNARD KENNY LTD
- WIMBLEDON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2000 LTD V DEREK VARGO
- MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 145869-2001 |
[2008] EWHC 2454 (TCC), 10 October 2008. The case discusses the conditions for interim third party debt orders to be made final. City and General (Holborn) (H) entered into a joint venture with Cambridge Gate Properties Limited and Temple Guiting Manor Limited (C), to buy a property. H contracted with Kier (K) to carry out development on the property. Problems followed. K obtained an adjudicator's award against H for delay-related losses and expenses. K obtained summary judgment to enforce the award but H did not pay it. K made an application to finalise interim third party debt orders against C. K thereby tried to enforce a judgment against H. H on his side made an application for a stay of execution of the judgment given against them in March 2006. "Held": The sums were not debts, but contingent liabilities. No profit or loss could be ascertained until determination of the development costs. No final party debt order could be made. K would be prevented from using other enforcement proceedings, at least until arbitration could be concluded.
See L133402