Time limits for appealing against or challenging an arbitral award in England and Wales
Language: English Series: Arbitration ; 74(4) November 2008, 360-368(9)Publication details: 2008Subject(s):- STUBBING V UNITED KINGDOM
- PEREZ DE RADA CAVANILLES V SPAIN
- LIMITATION ACT 1980
- ARBITRATION ACT 1996
- AOOT KALMNEFT V GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG
- SUREFIRE SYSTEMS LTD V GUARDIAN ECL LTD
- TORCH OFFSHORE LLC V CABLE SHIPPING INC
- MCCLEAN HOMES SOUTH EAST LTD V BLACKDALE LTD
- KALMNEFT V GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG
- DULWICH ESTATE V BAPTISTE
- SINCLAIR V WOODS OF WINCHESTER LTD
- AL-HADHA TRADING CO V TRADIGRAIN SA
- NAGUSINA NAVIERA V ALLIED MARITIME INC
- L BROWN AND SONS LTD V CROSBY HOMES (NORTH WEST) LTD
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L146408 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 146408-1001 |
Commenting on a number of law cases, considers the themes of the finality of proceedings and the degree of flexibility in the application of the time limit. Highlights the importance of adhering to strict time limits in the prosecution of arbitration claims and appeals. Concludes that if a party wishes to appeal or challenge an award, it must act as quickly as possible so that the arbitration system can work effectively. Late comers can expect little sympathy from the courts and will need to present compelling reasons for the delay.