New planning units, new chapters in planning history and inconsistent permissions
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (2), 161-173(13)Publication details: 2009Subject(s):- TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
- TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GENERAL PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT) ORDER 1995
- PRESTIGE HOMES (SOUTHERN) LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- PROSSER V MINISTER OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ANOR
- STAFFORDSHIRE CC V NGR LAND DEVELOPMENTS & ANOR
- WIGGINS V SOS ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS
- YOUNG V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- BURDLE V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- DURHAM CC V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ANOR
- JENNINGS MOTORS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- NEWBURY DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- PETTICOAT LANE RENTALS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- PILKINGTON V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- PIONEER AGGREGATES (UK) LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ORS
- England and Wales -- 1543-
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L146609 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 146609-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Article looks at planning permission and development control in light of recent legislative history. Discusses 'new planning units' and their interaction with existing rights. Also looks at perceived inconsistencies in the handling of planning cases by the courts. The authors posit that the statutory planning code has attained a high degree of sophistication that is not suited to its purpose and suggest a return to clearly defined rules and principles contained in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.