Image from Google Jackets

Qualified success

By: Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0913) 4 April 2009, 134-136(3)Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Summary: Explains that residential headleases have become more important in recent collective leasehold enfranchisement cases. Focuses on the House of Lords ruling in Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio, on whether a flat occupied by the head lessee could be subject to a collective enfranchisement claim under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 S2, and the Lands Tribunal decision in Nailrile Ltd v Earl Cadogan, on the valuation of intermediate leases. Argues that although some issues have been resolved, others have not.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L147181 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 147181-1001

Explains that residential headleases have become more important in recent collective leasehold enfranchisement cases. Focuses on the House of Lords ruling in Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio, on whether a flat occupied by the head lessee could be subject to a collective enfranchisement claim under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 S2, and the Lands Tribunal decision in Nailrile Ltd v Earl Cadogan, on the valuation of intermediate leases. Argues that although some issues have been resolved, others have not.