Beg, borrow or steal?
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 13 March 2009, 159(7360) 13 March 2009, 381-382(2)Publication details: 2009Subject(s):- CHEVAL BRIDGING FINANCE v BHASISN
- HEATH V SOUTHERN PACIFIC MORTGAGE LTD
- BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL V AUDUS
- R (ON THE APPLICATION OF SMITH) v LAND REGISTRY (PETERBOROUGH OFFICE)
- ST PANCRAS AND HUMANIST HOUSING ASSOCIATION LTD V LEONARD
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L147523 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 147523-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers recent decisions regarding mortgage possession and adverse possession. Issues covered include the need for mortgagors to have evidence of their financial means ready when seeking an adjournment of possession proceedings, Consumer Credit Act 1974 matters, when is a mortgage not a mortgage?, and that squatters cannot extinguish a public highway but can be estopped from claiming adverse possession.