Clarke v Murphy and Ors [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: LP/18/2008, 12 May 2009. Concerns an application by C to modify or discharge restrictive covenants to allow the demolition of a property and the erection of new dwellings on land which she owns. This proposal was objected to by those on neighbouring plots on the Estate, although it had received outline planning permission. The preliminary issue under consideration related to whether there was reciprocity of obligations between the purchasers of the plots, of which C's plot was one, enabling certain of the neighbours to object to the proposal. Held: It was clear from evidence presented to the Tribunal that the original purchasers of the nine plots on the Estate were each aware that the obligations contained in the relevant covenants were reciprocal.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 147869-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION United Kingdom [electronic resource] turnover rent, an attractive option in an uncertain market | ONLINE PUBLICATION Market commentary [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION King and others v Udlaw Ltd [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Clarke v Murphy and Ors [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Hanoman v London Borough of Southwark [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Icebird Ltd v Winegardner [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Climate change bill passed [electronic resource] |
LP/18/2008, 12 May 2009. Concerns an application by C to modify or discharge restrictive covenants to allow the demolition of a property and the erection of new dwellings on land which she owns. This proposal was objected to by those on neighbouring plots on the Estate, although it had received outline planning permission. The preliminary issue under consideration related to whether there was reciprocity of obligations between the purchasers of the plots, of which C's plot was one, enabling certain of the neighbours to object to the proposal. Held: It was clear from evidence presented to the Tribunal that the original purchasers of the nine plots on the Estate were each aware that the obligations contained in the relevant covenants were reciprocal.