Image from Google Jackets

Windsor Life Assurance Co Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank plc

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (947) 28 November 2009, 134-138(5) | Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [2009] 47 EG 134Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Summary: [2009], 15 October 2009. The case considers whether a landlord's application for grant of a new tenancy is dismissed at the date of notification by a tenant and the implications for both landlord and tenant. Windsor life Assurance Co Ltd (W) was the landlord and Lloyds TSB Bank (L) was the tenant of business premises with a term expiring in March 2008. W served notice, under section 29(5) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, that it would not oppose the grant of a new tenancy. L made an application for the determination of an interim rent pursuant to section 24A of the 1954 Act. 18 months later, L served a notice of discontinuance, expressing their desire not to take a new tenancy on these premises and gave three months notice. The defendant sought declaration to the court that the claim for a new tenancy was dismissed in April 2009. The order dismissing the claim was made in agreement in June 2009. "Held": declaration made in favour of the defendant. The judge concluded that it is not necessary to make a court application for a dismissal. The dismissal is automatic from the moment the court receives the tenant's notice.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L148998 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 148998-1001

[2009], 15 October 2009. The case considers whether a landlord's application for grant of a new tenancy is dismissed at the date of notification by a tenant and the implications for both landlord and tenant. Windsor life Assurance Co Ltd (W) was the landlord and Lloyds TSB Bank (L) was the tenant of business premises with a term expiring in March 2008. W served notice, under section 29(5) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, that it would not oppose the grant of a new tenancy. L made an application for the determination of an interim rent pursuant to section 24A of the 1954 Act. 18 months later, L served a notice of discontinuance, expressing their desire not to take a new tenancy on these premises and gave three months notice. The defendant sought declaration to the court that the claim for a new tenancy was dismissed in April 2009. The order dismissing the claim was made in agreement in June 2009. "Held": declaration made in favour of the defendant. The judge concluded that it is not necessary to make a court application for a dismissal. The dismissal is automatic from the moment the court receives the tenant's notice.