Hilmi Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2010Subject(s):- HILMI ASSOCIATES LTD V 20 PEMBRIDGE VILLAS FREEHOLD LTD
- LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
- SECTION 13 NOTICE
- CITY AND COUNTRY PROPERTIES LTD V PLOWDEN INVESTMENTS LTD
- COMPANIES ACT 1985 S36A
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 149912-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION The Health and Safety Executive [electronic resource] business plan 2010/11 | ONLINE PUBLICATION Tender price indicators [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Hughes v Borodex Ltd [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Hilmi Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Ng v Ashley King (Developments) Ltd [electronic resource] | ONLINE PUBLICATION Richard Buxton Solicitors v Mills-Owens | ONLINE PUBLICATION Statistics on mortgage and landlord possession actions in the county courts |
[2010] EWCA Civ 314, 30 March 2010. Concerned with validity of a Section 13 notice served by long leasehold tenants of a block of flats seeking to exercise their statutory right under the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1983 Chapter 1 to acquire the freehold by collective enfranchisement. Appeal concerned the signature of the fourth tenant which was a company which purported to sign the notice through a director and whether this was sufficient under s99(5)(a) and whether it met the terms of the Companies Act 1985 s36A relating to the execution of documents. "Held" appeal dismissed.