Breaking-up is hard to undo, particularly after a break notice has been served
Language: English Series: Lovells Real Estate Quarterly ; Spring 2010, 16-18(3)Publication details: 2010Subject(s): Summary: Reviews the problems and inadvertent consequences for tenants of agreeing to withdraw a break notice after it has been served. If tenant and landlord agree the notice to be withdrawn, the break notice remains effective but their conduct is deemed to have created a new tenancy on the expiry of the break notice. Case law on this proposition originates from Tayleur v Wildin (1868). Advises tenants to register the deemed new tenancies straightaway.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L150063 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 150063-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews the problems and inadvertent consequences for tenants of agreeing to withdraw a break notice after it has been served. If tenant and landlord agree the notice to be withdrawn, the break notice remains effective but their conduct is deemed to have created a new tenancy on the expiry of the break notice. Case law on this proposition originates from Tayleur v Wildin (1868). Advises tenants to register the deemed new tenancies straightaway.