Under a shadow
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1115) 16 April 2011, 82-84(3)Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Summary: Implications for the development industry after HXRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] which was settled before the hearing of the appeal. Argues that developers cannot assume that rights of lights can be paid off prior to or duing the course of a trial.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L152780 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 152780-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Implications for the development industry after HXRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] which was settled before the hearing of the appeal. Argues that developers cannot assume that rights of lights can be paid off prior to or duing the course of a trial.