MW Trustees Limited , Robert Posel, Pamela Posel v Telular Corporation
Language: English Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2011] EWHC 104 (Ch), 31 January 2011. Considers the validity of a break notice served on the incorrect landlord where the managing agent purported to accept it. Defendant (T) had the option to break its lease with claimant landlord (MW) by giving not less than six months' notice in writing but served the notice on the previous landlord not MW . MW's managing agent accepted the notice in an invalid email form agreeing that T could break the lease. MW argued that the break was not effective. "Held": The notice was valid. The managing agent's reply accepted the notice as valid despite the defective method of service.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 152967-2001 |
[2011] EWHC 104 (Ch), 31 January 2011. Considers the validity of a break notice served on the incorrect landlord where the managing agent purported to accept it. Defendant (T) had the option to break its lease with claimant landlord (MW) by giving not less than six months' notice in writing but served the notice on the previous landlord not MW . MW's managing agent accepted the notice in an invalid email form agreeing that T could break the lease. MW argued that the break was not effective. "Held": The notice was valid. The managing agent's reply accepted the notice as valid despite the defective method of service.