Still an empty concept?
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1129) 23 July 2011, 84-85(2)Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Summary: Reports on the Court of Appeal's decision in NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 on the subject of break clauses. This case gives a clear definition of vacant possession but several problems arrise such as the distinction given between people and chattels. Arguably the decision in NYK is best understood not as a change in the law on vacant possession but rather a reformulation of existing principles.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L153456 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 153456-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reports on the Court of Appeal's decision in NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 on the subject of break clauses. This case gives a clear definition of vacant possession but several problems arrise such as the distinction given between people and chattels. Arguably the decision in NYK is best understood not as a change in the law on vacant possession but rather a reformulation of existing principles.