After the goldrush
Language: English Series: Hogan Lovells Real Estate Quarterly ; Summer Issue, 10-11(2)Publication details: 2012Subject(s):- GOLDACRE (OFFICES) LTD v NORTEL NETWORKS UK LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
- LEISURE (NORWICH) II LTD V LUMINAR LAVA IGNITE LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
- RE ATLANTIC COMPUTER SYSTEMS
- RE TOSHOKU FINANCE PLC (IN LIQUIDATION)
- EXETER CITY COUNCIL V BAIRSTOW
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- Landlord and tenant
- Commercial property
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 157323-2001 |
Considers whether the status of the decision in "Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in administration)" ([2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch) (L154706)) about rent payable in administration, heralded as a victory for landlords, can remain untarnished when it has led to further disputes, most importantly "Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd and ors v Luminar lava Ignite Ltd (in administration)" ([2012 EWHC 951 (Ch) (L156895)). "Goldacre" has created unfairness on all sides but remains good law, judicially endorsed in "Luminar" as "plainly right".